What is a writer supposed to do about a review blasting a character's--well, character?
It is certainly a dilemma at times to figure it out if you are looking
to reviews as a indicator of reader contentment with your work.
First, the writer should probably ask if the comment is fair about the character. So in the case of Dating A Cougar, I had to ask questions like "Is Casey sexist?" The answer is "Yes", or at least he has sexist moments. Is he controlling? Yes, he could be seen that way. Many military men are prone to wanting to control everything and everyone in their environment. It's part of their training and a trait that seems to carry over into the rest of their life. Most get a handle on it, but some of it always remains in their character I think.
Also, I think a writer should look at other more positive reviews of the same character. Compare them and consider that it might just have been that one person or those two people who felt the way they did.
First, the writer should probably ask if the comment is fair about the character. So in the case of Dating A Cougar, I had to ask questions like "Is Casey sexist?" The answer is "Yes", or at least he has sexist moments. Is he controlling? Yes, he could be seen that way. Many military men are prone to wanting to control everything and everyone in their environment. It's part of their training and a trait that seems to carry over into the rest of their life. Most get a handle on it, but some of it always remains in their character I think.
Also, I think a writer should look at other more positive reviews of the same character. Compare them and consider that it might just have been that one person or those two people who felt the way they did.
My writer dilemma in dealing with negative reviews about Casey in Dating A Cougar
is that I intentionally wrote him to be exactly who he was in that
book. As a writer, I couldn't have made a Marine less a Marine for the
sake of making Casey less offensive to some female readers. What
would be the point of downplaying his personality or the eighteen year
military career I gave him? The whole
point of matching a less-than-perfect, but extremely strong alpha hero
with an equally strong alpha heroine who thinks she doesn't need to
change is to enjoy the two of them
wrestling for compromise.
So
how can I respond with any writer action to satisfy a reviewer who
comments about not liking my hero? Well, I can't, or I guess I
should say in the instance of my hero Casey at least--I won't. My
characters are vetted by beta readers before I publish which helps me
achieve a modest amount of assurance they are likeable. However, you
can't please everybody and that means your characters won't be able to
do it either.
Before
I published my writing, one of the lessons parenting three children
taught me is that sometimes you have to refuse something to a person you
deeply care about
for a higher purpose. During a particularly fierce argument about why
she was not being allowed to do something, my oldest daughter as a
teenager yelled "I hate you" to me. I was caught off-guard by the
directness and sincerity of her comment at the time, but knew as her
parent I was
right to set that particular limitation for the greater good of both of
us and our family. Having been trained at the Bill Cosby Show school of
parenting, I pushed the blubbering mother emotions aside and yelled back
"Good! That means I'm doing my job."
4 comments:
Great blog, Donna.
Thanks Carley.
You did a great job with Casey's character. I loved the bantering between the two of them. But then, I love everything you write and can hardly wait to purchase your next one. Maybe yet this month???
Good writing, Donna!!!
Bontanyflora, thanks for the comment. It's always nice to hear from those who love the stories. It balances it all for me.
Next book? I'm in the process of publishing "Created In Fire" right now. It should be for sale in a day or two. I'll publish a blog post, tweet, and put it on FB when it's available.
Post a Comment